INFORMED DOG BREEDERS OPPOSE NATIONAL “HAPPY ACT” HR3501
We have received numerous
emails regarding the "Happy Act", i.e. HR3501, asking for our
thoughts. We ask that you consider this information prior to signing
any petition in support of this bill. HR3501, although appearing to
be very appealing and beneficial to breeders and animal owners,
should be opposed.
by
Linda D. Witouski & Ken Sondej,
The
Monthly National Legislation Report, an IRS 527 PAC
November
2009 / ©
TheDogPlace.org
- It is of our opinion that this bill does exactly
what it was intended to do. To draw in unsuspecting breeders who believe they
are getting a "break" and it is being done exactly in the style to which we who
work legislation are accustomed to seeing, or should be accustomed to seeing, by
now.
Those who believe this is a 'good thing' should stop and reconsider how bills
are amended as they make their way through Congress. Although some feel it
worthy of support as currently written, consideration needs to be given
regarding the amendments that HSUS could/would add that most likely will end up
not benefiting breeders at all, rather, it could/would be more detrimental to
your rights to own animals in the end. This is not an unfamiliar tactic in
politics, as many of you more experienced in the legislative arena are aware -
gain the support of the opposition with some "feel good" legislation, amend,
amend, amend - and then advise Congress that it was "what everybody wanted." If
you sign on to it in the beginning, you have no defense - you signed up to
support it and your signature on any petition will be proof positive.
Everybody should be aware by now that the HSUS is looking at taxes that are not
being collected from breeders, as evidenced in the not so long ago Indiana
confiscation in which back taxes surpassed $130,000. No better way could
possibly exist in tracking hobby breeders than to claim they were avoiding
paying income taxes on their dogs. In order to claim tax deductions, you must
first claim a profit, and in doing so, hobby breeders will no longer be
considered as such and would then fall under other more stringent regulations,
possibly causing the hobbyist to be reconsidered as a "business." In addition,
there are many rural and urban areas that are not zoned for "business" and many
hobby breeders will then be in the target scope and in jeopardy of losing their
animals because of "zoning regulations and restrictions" in those particular
areas that are not zoned for business. Professional, licensed breeders already
deduct expenses. Hobbyists, by signing any petitions, would be voluntarily
setting themselves up to lose their hobbyist status and would then be required
to prove all expenses for their animals once they are considered as
"professional breeders." While you, as a hobbyist, may gain on one level, you
will surely lose on several others once your status is changed.
A little background on Linda Witouski:
-
AKC Judge & Delegate
-
AKC SC
Legislation Representative
-
Legislation Chair, BOD &
Delegate - Myrtle Beach KC
-
Legislation Chair -
Miniature Pinscher Club of America
-
Legislation Chair -
Yankee Miniature Pinscher Club
-
SC Camo Coalition Steering
Committee
-
SC Assembly of Sportsmen's Caucuses
-
Leg.
Editor & Investigative Reporter – TheDogPress.com
-
State
Of Mine Leg. Editor – NetPlaces, LLC
-
Co-Author, Monthly
National Legislation Report
-
Owner:
DogLegislation@yahoogroups.com
-
Owner:
MinPinInReview@yahoogroups.com
-
Owner: SC Animal,
Sportsmen & Wildlife Voting Coalition
|
As "Happy" as this bill may sound, there are far too many unanswered questions
when reading in between the lines and while this bill, as is currently written,
appears to only entail "health care for animals", can you possibly
conceive in
your own mind that HSUS or any other anti animal group will leave it as is when
it gives them the perfect opportunity to add to it as it makes its way through
the legislation process?
Additionally, allowing (up to) a $3500 deduction also increases the potential of
a dog's value. Animal rights attorneys are constantly testing the courts in this
currently gray area for purposes of malpractice and emotional damages.
Permitting tax deductions for dogs is one more step up the "they are family and
should be in an elevated property status" ladder.
We fully realize that the "Happy Act", HR3501, is a "feel
good" piece of nationwide legislation to unsuspecting supporters but we
also realize that this bill has the potential of putting animals on the same
level as humans and sets a very dangerous precedent in equating animals with the
seniors, the elderly and children, who currently are permitted to have
deductions taken by their caregivers. This bill creates the perfect backdrop for
"guardianship."
As such, the Monthly National Legislation Report, and the organizations listed
below, oppose this bill and asks that you take the time to consider all possible
ramifications prior to making any decision other than opposition.
Currently, the following organizations have joined the MNLR in opposing HR3501:
SAOVA
MOFED
Nevada Animal Owners & Sportsmen - Voting Alliance
SC Animal Owners & Sportsmen Voting Coalition
SC Federation of Dog Clubs
*Note: If your organization would like to join the Opposed
list, please drop an email to
4winds@viawest.net or
dropfred13@aol.com
Read the bill here:
HR3501 – The Happy Act -
Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (“HAPPY”) Act
https://www.thedogplace.org/Project/Federal/09112-Happy-Act_Witouski-0911.asp
SSI

|
Your Membership
enables the world's first public website (1998) to provide free information by our international Science and Advisory Board. Please join our educational project for all dog owners.
Become A Charter Member!
|
|
|