From The Miniature Bull Terrier Club
of England Handbook
Edited by Mrs. V. Allenden
Lens luxation is the name used to describe a
situation in the eye wherein the crystalline lens is not
found in its normal position but is lying either in the
anterior chamber in front of the iris or behind the iris
not within the hyaloid fossa. Luxation occurs due to
weakening of the ligaments holding the lens. Usually
lens luxation is associated with secondary glaucoma. The
overall condition is painful and requires an operation.
The lens is not as important to the dog as is the lens
to man and accordingly the operation still leaves the
dog with some vision.
The condition was first reported by Nicolas in 1925 and
has been reviewed in several books on canine genetics
(e.g. Hutt, 1979; Robinson, 1982; Willis, 1989). It does
appear to be fairly late in onset; usually after two
years of age and often later with cases being observed
as late as 7 years. It also appears to be bilateral in
that although one lens will luxate eventually the other
will follow suit though an interval of weeks or months
may occur between the two happenings.
Breeds Affected
Lens luxation is essentially a "terrier" defect. It has
been observed principally in Wire Fox Terriers and
Sealyhams but it has also been seen in the Smooth Fox
Terrier and in the Jack Russell. It is also well
established in the Miniature Bull Terrier and has been
seen in Scottish Terriers as well as in the Tibetan
Terrier which, despite its name, is not a terrier. Other
non-terrier breeds such as the German Shepherd, Border
Collie, Greyhound, Welsh Corgi and Miniature Poodle have
had cases reported but at nothing like the frequency of
terrier breeds.
It is known that trauma (accident) can cause lens
luxation if damage to the suspensory ligament is
occasioned and some of the non-terrier cases might be
made in this way but there is ample evidence that the
condition is likely to be genetic in most instances and
one is wise to assume inherited cases unless trauma is
assured by veterinary diagnosis.
Mode of Inheritance
The most extensive report on the genetics of lens
luxation was by Willis et al (1979) looking at the
Tibetan Terrier using British and Swedish data. The
evidence was in support of a simple autosomal recessive
in that breed and it is not improbable that the same
mode of inheritance occurs in other breeds. In the
Tibetan Terrier the condition traced back to dogs of
unknown or incomplete pedigree registered in the days
when dogs "looking like" the breed could be registered
as Class II registrations. Almost certainly, the cases
in the Tibetan Terrier traced back to dogs that looked
like but were not Tibetan Terriers.
A simple autosomal recessive means that the condition
can occur in either sex and that it is generally
transmitted by what appear to be normal animals though
the late onset of the condition can result in "affected"
dogs producing the defect because they were used prior
to their "affected" state being known.
With a simple recessive we have three kinds of dog. If
we use N as indicating the normal gene (allele) and n
the abnormal or lens luxation gene then we have:
-
NN normal dog showing no problems and producing
none.
-
Nn apparently normal dog never showing the problem
but producing it in some offspring or capable of
doing so.
-
nn affected animal.
There are six different kinds of mating that could take
place ignoring the sex of parents. These are shown below
with expected proportions of progeny.
|
MATING |
|
Percent progeny that are: |
|
| |
Normal (NN) |
Carrier (Nn) |
Affected (nn) |
|
1. NN x NN |
100 |
0 |
0 |
|
2. NN x Nn |
50 |
50 |
0 |
|
3. NN x nn |
0 |
100 |
0 |
|
4. Nn x Nn |
25 |
50 |
25 |
|
5. Nn x nn |
0 |
50 |
50 |
|
6. nn x nn |
0 |
0 |
100 |
Three of the matings (3,5 and 6) involve using affected
stock. These are not likely to occur often but in view
of late onset of lens luxation can take place at least
in early life. All three types of mating would result in
the n (abnormal) allele being transmitted to the next
generation and in two cases (5,6) could give rise to
affected stock. Mating 6 (affected to affected) would be
expected to give 100% affected progeny while mating 1
gives rise to no affected progeny at all. Mating 2 is a
difficult one since it gives rise lo no affected stock
but ensures that the n allele is passed on to half the
progeny though the owners may never realize this because
they may never know that they were using one Nn parent.
The most common mating giving the problem is mating 4
when two apparently normal dogs are mated and give rise
to affected progeny. This mating of two carriers is the
commonest way of discovering recessive genes. However,
although the mating gives rise to 75% "normal" and 25%
affected, it really gives rise to 25% normal, 50%
carriers and 25% affected. In any one litter no
affecteds may occur especially in a breed like the
Miniature Bull Terrier where small litters are likely to
occur. The fact that no affecteds occur makes studies
difficult but also makes it difficult lo exonerate
animals.
One can conclude. quite categorically that if lens
luxation occurs in a litter then BOTH parents must, at
the very least, carry the affected (n) allele. Their
parents must therefore be either Nn or they could be nn
in which the condition has not yet manifested itself. On
the other hand, the fact that an animal has not produced
the condition does not automatically mean that, that
animal is free of the allele. An animal, especially a
bitch, may be Nn but be mated always to NN mates and
thus never give nn progeny or it might be mated to an Nn
mate but, by chance, not give rise to other than Nn or
NN cases.
If an affected case occurs in a litter then what are
the risks from the other littermates, which appear
normal? A litter mate to an affected (nn) pup has a 2 to
1 chance of being a carrier (Nn) and a 1 in 3 chance of
being normal (NN) but there are no easy ways one can
tell which. Clearly one is better avoiding the use of
littermates to affected pups although the late onset
makes it difficult to find out before littermates are
used.
Advice to follow
Data are being collected on cases in the breed but we
require more. Any breeder who has had a case diagnosed
should send me a 5 generation pedigree of the case
animal stating the sex of the affected animal(s) and the
age at onset. Also we require to know how many pups of
each sex existed in the litter. This will enable
clarification of the mode of inheritance. Is it like the
Tibetan Terrier or not?
Breeders should not breed from affected (nn) cases as
soon as these are identified, They should avoid breeding
again from parents of affected stock since these parents
are likely to be at least Nn. However if one can
identify NN animals with certainly then some Nn to NN
mating might occur if the gene pool warrants it and dogs
are outstanding in certain attributes. This will,
however, transmit the n allele to the next generation so
is best avoided except in exceptional
circumstances with exceptional dogs. As yet we cannot be
certain of source dogs so it would be premature to
indicate lines to avoid. The problem is one that will
not go away without positive effort from breeders and it
requires collaboration if the incidence is to be
identified and reduced. If we are dealing with a simple
autosomal recessive then it has to be understood that it
cannot, with present genetic understanding, be totally
eliminated from the breed. What one can hope to do is
reduce the incidence of the problem but that requires
the whole-hearted support of ALL breeders towards the
common good.
Inherited defects can occur in anyone's kennels. If you
have not yet had lens luxation then you should thank
your lucky stars but you should give every help to those
who have had the problem. Genetic problems are not
reduced except by all of us pulling together on the same
problem.
References:
Hutt, F.B. 1979. Genetics for Dog Breeders. W.H.
Freeman, San Francisco. .
Nicolas, E. 1925. Veterinary & Comparative
Ophthalmology. H. & W. Brown, London.
Robinson, R. 1982. Genetics for Dog Breeders. Pergamon,
Oxford.
Willis, M.B. 1989. Genetics of the Dog. H.F. & G. Witherby, London.
Willis, M.B., Curtis, R., Barnett, K.C. & Temple, W .M.
1979. Genetic aspects of lens luxation in the Tibetan
Terrier. Vet. Rec. 104: 409-412.
Dr. M.B. Willis
Faculty of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle-upon-
Tyne, NE1 7RU
©The Miniature Bull Terrier Club (England)
http://www.thedogplace.org/Genetics/PLL-Lens-Luxation-Dog_Allenden.asp