IS HSUS COMING "UNGLUED"?
August 28, 2012 Mr. Pacelle stated that Frank Losey:
Is "an individual hostile to animal welfare;"
Has "a serious honesty problem;"
Defends "puppy mills, (Walking Horse) soring, factory
farming, and all other abuses;"
Has "been dishonest," and
Is "not an honorable person."
In a gesture of Good Faith, I offered Mr. Pacelle, President and
CEO of The Humane Society Of The U.S., an opportunity to
withdraw his disparaging comments which I described as
"outrageous, unsubstantiated, unfounded, defaming, and libelous
lies." And how did Mr. Pacelle respond to this "Good
Faith" gesture? Silence! Deafening Silence!!!!!
Why would Mr. Pacelle so disparage Frank Losey?
Could it be that Mr. Pacelle has learned that Frank Losey has
cumulatively submitted over 2,500 pages of incriminating
documents to Members of Congress; to the Office of the Inspector
General of the Department of Agriculture; to the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS); to the Department of the Treasury; and to
the Department of Justice?
Could it be because Frank Losey's "Calls to Action" have
orchestrated 20,000-30,000 E-Mails and Letters being sent from
citizens in all 50 States to Members of Congress, to the IRS and
to the Justice Department documenting that the Humane Society
of the U.S. (HSUS) may be violating the U.S. Tax Code which
provides that "Public Charities," such as the HSUS, may
not engage in "TOO MUCH LOBBYING;" and that the HSUS may
be violating the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
because it has not been registered as a Lobbying Organization
since August of 2006, at which time it terminated its
Registration as a "Lobbying Organization" with both
Houses of Congress? (Prior to August 2006, the HSUS was
registered as a "Lobbying Organization" and listed Mr. Pacelle
as its Chief Lobbyist!)
Could it be because the more than 2,500 incriminating documents
that I, Frank Losey submitted through Official Government
Channels, as well as the 20,000-30,000 or more E-Mails and
Letters that were received by Government Officials in Congress,
the IRS, the Treasury Department and the Justice Department have
illuminated a chilling and growing belief by more and more
Government Officials who are echoing an internal whispering
"BUZZ OF ALARM?" Frank Losey keeps documenting facts that
establish by "clear and convincing evidence" that "cover-ups"
may be occurring within Government Agencies; that information is
being improperly leaked back to the HSUS; that the HSUS may not
be in compliance with the U.S. Tax Code; and that the
HSUS may not be in compliance with the Lobbying Disclosure
Act of 1995?!?!?
Could it also be because Mr. Pacelle now knows that Senator
Hatch, who chaired the Hearing that ultimately resulted in the
Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act being amended after
"9-11," has recently told a constituent that, with regards to
the HSUS, "I share your belief that this law
(Lobbying Disclosure Act) has been violated, the Justice
Department should respond with appropriate action?!?!?"
And in this regard, is it possible that Mr. Pacelle could be
embarrassed by his prior written correspondence (dated January
18, 2008) that suggested that the Animal Enterprise
Terrorism Act, is an "unjust law" worthy
of "civil disobedience?!?"
As recently as August 9, 2012 a U.S. Representative wrote to the
IRS Commissioner and stated: "Years
ago when I first wrote you regarding the tax-exempt status of
the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS ). . . . I have
provided the IRS with documentation that I believe clearly
demonstrates that the HSUS has abused its tax-exempt status, and
I stand ready to provide additional supporting documents."
Perhaps Mr. Pacelle was not pleased that since the HSUS donates
a lower percentage of its annual income to local shelters than
does Frank Losey, this would suggest that the HSUS is more "hostile
to animal welfare" than Frank Losey is! And then could
Mr. Pacelle have gone ballistic when he read the closing
paragraph in my previous letter was dated August 13, 2012, which
read as follows:
"Tragically, the HSUS, which professes to care so much about
animal welfare, has NEVER - - REPEAT - - NEVER used its Website
to educate pet owners … on procedures as to how best to protect
their puppies and dogs from contracting Parvo. This "deadly"
omission of information about Parvo for pet owners by the HSUS,
that purportedly has a following of millions, suggests that
there has been a conscious and unconscionable decision to keep
the American Public and Elected Officials at the Federal, State
and Local Levels of Government in the dark so that the spread of
Parvo will be inhumanely perpetuated, and be exploited and
misrepresented to the American Public as being caused by
irresponsible breeding practices in order to further enhance the
fundraising activities of the HSUS.
To dispel such a notion, I implore the HSUS to immediately
spend a relatively insignificant amount of its annual revenue,
($150 Million Dollars a year), on a Nationwide Campaign that
highlights and educates the American Public, and especially the
new owners of puppies, on how best to protect healthy puppies
from contracting Parvo. Failure to do so will lead me, and
others, to conclude that the Humane Society of the U.S. has a
hidden agenda that is "hostile to animal welfare."
Regardless of what Mr. Pacelle thinks about me, there is NO
"HUMANE" REASON for the HSUS to continue to keep dog owners
in the dark as to how best to prevent young puppies from
contracting PARVO. Could it be that the sanctimonious HSUS
INHUMANELY wishes to perpetuate the spread of PARVO among
young puppies and sacrifice their precious young lives so that
the HSUS may continue what appears to be a deceptive practice of
citing "sick puppies" as a basis for the American Public to
continue to contribute Tens of Millions of Dollars each
year to the coffers of the HSUS which contributes a smaller
percentage of its annual income to local shelters than does
Losey Letter to HSUS' Wayne Pacelle