|
 Roughly
28,000 Chihuahuas are registered each year with AKC but less than 2% are
registered by active AKC breeder/exhibitors. Unfortunately, it seems like that
makes our voice the minority when it comes to the purity of the stud book,
historically the main focus of the AKC.
According to respected geneticists, Dr Malcolm Willis among them, the merle
color pattern did NOT naturally mutate in the Chihuahua breed. So why would
anyone risk introducing outside genetic faults into a supremely healthy breed?
Was it accidental or was cash the motivation? Consider that many are marketing
merle puppies as a “rare deviation” at higher prices than excellent show
prospects from AKC show breeders.
Many of these merle-colored Chihuahuas are very poor representatives of the
breed. Why? Well that's what happens when dogs are cross bred. You get
undesirable characteristics of the breed that was used in the cross. Sadly they
are all being registered as Chihuahuas. Some breeders are not concerned,
claiming after 4 generations they are purebred. But a club must ask AKC for
carefully monitored permission to crossbreed for the improvement of the breed,
as was granted for example to the Basenjis. Continued registrations of merle
Chihuahuas dispute that rule.
When one looks at the current trend in designer mutts it seems that the AKC
would be concerned about losing registrations. Brindle coloration has recently
been added to the "rare" colors for pugs, merle has been added to cocker
spaniels, poodles and miniature pinchers and those genetically foreign colors
are being registered. Why is such obvious cross breeding allowed to be
registered as purebred? This is a question one must ask AKC. In fact, now might
be a good time to ask as AKC has announced it is actually considering
registering mongrels.
 Breeds
that are traditionally merle have limited the colors so that the dogs can be
bred in a healthy and humane manner. Merle is perfectly acceptable in these
breeds and genetic education is available. Sadly no one knows how merle will
affect the gene pool of the Chihuahua because it is one of the few AKC breeds
whose standard allows all colors. The effect on type, particularly the “saucy
expression” called for in the standard all but disappears when one is confronted
with the cold blue-eyed stare of a merle.
Of special concern, some geneticists have said that mixing the piebald gene and
the merle gene is likely to cause the same defects as merle to merle breeding,
one of the worst being pigmentation related deafness. The problem here is that
some breeders cannot differentiate the piebald coat pattern from other spotting
genes. Studies conducted with dapple dachshunds (another breed that allows
several color choices) have confirmed that “single merles” can and do have the
same defects as their “double merle” counterparts.
What will happen with the defective puppies? Are they bucket fodder or will they
continue to genetically infect the breed, passing defective dogs to unsuspecting
buyers? Rescue operations are already overloaded with our breed and sadly, this
can only add dogs to their ranks.
All this being said why would anyone add this to a gene pool where it had never
existed? It can not improve the breed. Perhaps they are bored with all the other
lovely colors in the Chihuahua that are not linked to physical defects? These
are things one must ask before breeding this pattern and claiming it to be a
pleasant color variant. That is not a reason to cross breed. There is no breed
improvement with the addition of this pattern. Some will claim bad patellas are
the worst problem in our breed. While that is a concern, even a bad patella can
be surgically corrected to give the dog quality of life plus, we can breed away
from the trait. Deafness is a permanent defective feature, part and parcel of
the merle gene and its pigment-reducing characteristics.
Most of the breeders involved with merle Chihuahuas have never bred quality dogs
before taking on this pattern. How can they expect to take a cross breed and
bring it up to the standard that exists in today's show ring? One would hope
judges will not award such dogs merely because they want to see an unusual
pattern flourish in a breed where it has never existed.
 Several
countries including Germany and Australia have banned or refused the
registrations of merle Chihuahuas. The Canadian Kennel Club has allowed the
Canadian Chihuahua Club's request for a disqualification. The UK and South
Africa are now discussing the situation. Breeders in other countries also
believe adding this pattern will bring with it many defects. That plays into the
hands of Animal Rights Activists who want to ban breeding altogether because
people are purposely breeding dogs that have known defects. Are foreign breeders
more informed than their American counterparts or did they have a big heads up
by watching merle cross breeding unfold in this country?
Reputable breeders of the future may have to resort to expensive genetic testing
to insure they are not adding this pattern to their lines. With all colors
allowed in Chihuahuas, there is more of a chance to have the phantom or hidden
merles. For now, lines have been drawn in the sand and for concerned Chihuahua
breeders “no merles bred here” will be a badge of honor and commitment to a
breed that does not need this color pattern or its known defects. Any color
“marked or splashed” is not a license to cross breed!
The Chihuahua Club of America will be voting on several standard revisions,
including one to disqualify the merle pattern from the show ring.
The petitions must go for a vote within the 6 months time
they have been received and we are confident that those concerned will
do the
right thing concerning our breed.
Thank You for coming - Thank You for Caring
|
Back