|
AKC's
Signature
Show is Held in Long
Beach, CA
Long Beach proposes to lift Breeding Ban...
Could a revision to the Long Beach breeding
ordinance have anything to do with the announcement
of the AKC / Eukanuba National Classic being held
there???? Does AKC deserve applause for pulling it
off? Or does the choice of venue deserve a kick in
the pants for causing license fees to triple?
The Classic or National or whatever you call it will
be held in Long Beach. It's characterized in the
local press as an “annual dog breeding event”
which is illegal in Long Beach! Talk about a
contradiction! But money talks because the event
will bring millions in tourist revenue as people
flock to the show and drop a lotta money in food,
lodging, mementos, and sightseeing. The article
points out “In 2003, the city gained about $4.6
million from the event” and that's an
understatement. Did other money go to Long Beach to
secure the venue and a change in ordinance as has
been alleged? Was it that alluring a site when
there are so many others? Did the no-breeding
ordinance make AKC seem just a little too
hypocritical? Many questions which may never be
answered.
After all,
who wants bragging rights to that kind of deal?
"We think it's a great place for the dog show,"
said Daisy Okas of the American Kennel Club
Communications and PR department. "We've been
very clear that (lifting the ban is) important to us
if we're going to look at (Long Beach) as a
permanent home."
You decide if it is a good thing or
not. If the revision passes, (it will) dog
license fees will increase $18. That brings it up to
$54 per year
to keep
an intact dog. There's a provision for a $500 fee
to acquire a breeding permit. The added revenue is
to help finance additional employees to enforce the
ordinance.
Quoting Animal Control Office, “I believe that
this does give us a tool in which we can enforce the
ordinance," Moore said. "I think we will be
able to enforce backyard breeders breeding multiple
litters." Figure that one out! Does that mean
people have been breeding litters in violation of
the no-breeding ban and now they will have the staff
to catch them, at the expense of show breeders who
will pay the fee to be legal? He also points out
that “revenue from violation citations would
support the new staff” so it probably will
generate new income but the quick shift in policy
could be interpreted as proof the ban wasn’t needed
in the beginning, right? Or maybe it’s just that
money talks and when funds are there to control
breeding, it is okay to breed. Get it?
Not everyone is happy. "I'd rather have no
breeding until we can handle what's already being
bred and what's being dropped off at our shelter,"
said Justin Rudd, an animal activist. "There's
too much breeding by irresponsible or unethical
people."
The city impounded 4,126 dogs in 2005 and numbers
have been stable in representing an improvement from
1995, when 6,378 dogs were impounded. Rudd says the
new enforcers could be going into all the
neighborhoods to let people know that breeding dogs
without a permit is illegal.
So here’s the way it stacks up, quoting from the
presstelegram. “The Long Beach Municipal Code
has prohibited dog breeding for decades. But the
American Kennel Club, which holds regional dog shows
at the Long Beach Convention Center, recently pushed
for the new ordinance after learning of the
prohibition.”
It depends on the perspective. Either good that the
higher fees will generate money enough to cover
enforcing a more tolerant ordinance or that there
should never have been a breeding ban in the first
place!! One must wonder why in the world there
would have been another dog show, ever, in a place
that bans breeding, purebred or otherwise? Is it a
good thing that AKC saw an opportunity to hold it’s
Signature Show there, in that city?
And that in bringing millions of acknowledged
revenue to the area, it managed to get the city to
lift the breeding ban? At a price of course.
Many questions and they will be debated long after
the AKC Eukanuba Classic National Show in Long Beach
has become just another memory.
Source:
www.Presstelegram.com Long Beach Calif.
dateline 2/21/06.
We thank Susan Wolf
www.cubhill.com,
for calling
this ying-yang situation to our
attention. Editorial comments do not necessarily
reflect Ms. Wolf’s position nor that of the Press
Telegram. Courtesy of
TheDogPress.com
|