TheDogPlace - Home >> Project:  Breeder Bill Of Rights
 

2006 Year Of The Dog  and   Breeder Bill Of Rights

reference - problems confronting Private Breeders - Email your comments & line item suggestions for first draft
 

Who's looking out for YOU?  Project: 2006 Breeder Bill Of Rights defines and defends the Private Breeder.

TheDogPlace knows what threatens the breed purist in today's power-driven society.

TheDogPlace loves dogs and those who prove they do, every day, in every way.

TheDogPlace upholds the original AKC Mission Statement and
our  Mission is clear. 

This Organization has supported the sport since 1999 and will continue to:

Preserve and Protect
the traditional,
inherent Rights
of all who love dogs.

Thank You to TheDogPress.com
for encouraging its subscribers to support Breeder Bill Of Rights


If you are a dedicated Private Breeder with a plan for the future, you will be interested in the following.....

Handy Links

AKC/Eukanuba 2006 Venue Conflict
Long Beach Lifts Breeding Ban but at what cost?

Home Invasion!! Virginia Style
Land where freedom was born strips citizen Rights

Mandatory 2006 Spay/Neuter Bill
VA. proposes law with NO EXCEPTIONS

 Animal Rights vs The Showing Fancier
A growing conflict examined by Private Breeder/Judge

SPCA Steals Dogs
ABC's 20/20 undercover reveals Houston SPCA at work!

and more on the way!

Send Your Comments for line items or points for the first BBR draft OR synopsis of Breeder Privacy or Rights infringement.

ANIMAL RIGHTS AND THE SHOWING FANCIER

by Tam Cordingley

The Animal Rights/ Animal Control/ Humane Society people have lined up against the dog people to create what they view as a solution to the dog/cat overpopulation problem.  In fact the group I represent don't wish to be lumped in with the backyard breeders and commercial market breeders.  We are a group of dedicated, responsible hobbyists, much akin to the hunting dog people.  We wish to be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

The solution to the Animal Control and overpopulation problem lies not in legislating responsible hobbyists out of their hobby, but in making a distinction between the careless indiscriminate puppy producer, and the responsible Show or Field exhibitor.  Most legislation specifically excludes the hunting dog people.  This exclusion is because the dogs are used recreationally, kept fenced when not under the owner's direct control, vaccinated, and too valuable to end up a ward of Animal Control.  All of these same conditions apply to the showing fancier who typically spends money and time on and with their dogs.  They contribute significantly to the revenue of their respective states. 

Look at a typical dog show exhibitor.  They either have a motor home or stay numerous weekends a year in local motels, they eat at restaurants, buy gasoline, enter events and buy products at dog shows in their state.  Most are property owners, all vaccinate their pets, most keep older retired dogs until they die, they breed seldom and place puppies carefully.  They all keep their dogs fenced for security.  These are not the people creating the animal control nightmare, they are the law abiding citizens who will be harmed by restrictive and all inclusive legislation.

I see this not as dog people against Animal Control but rather as a triangular issue.  One side being Animal rights and Animal Control, a second being the hunting or exhibiting breed fancier, and the third being the backyard breeder and the mass producers.  In many communities the Animal Control people and the fanciers are strongly aligned and are of significant help to each other.  For example, every breed has a rescue committee that will take dogs of their breeds from shelters, spay or neuter, and place them in homes.    In well over 40 years as a dog show and obedience trial exhibitor I have never met a fellow dog show exhibitor that didn't fence their dogs, or otherwise confine them.  I have also never met one who didn't vaccinate for rabies.

As dog people it is our responsibility to educate the legislators about Issues WE know.  The AR people work mightily to push thru legislation in many states and it sounds fine if you don't truly understand the situation.  To this end, and hopefully to improve the situation of the showing fancier, I would ask you to cut and paste the 3 paragraphs above to any and all discussion groups to which you belong and to as many dog people as you know.

Showing Fanciers of America is a group dedicated to helping in a positive way to educate the legislators without being viewed as breeders.  The simple word Breeder, to us as hobbyists a proud title, is viewed by AR and AC people as the bad guy.  The only way to differentiate ourselves and be seen as different from the backyard breeder or puppy miller is to label ourselves differently.

Tam Cordingley, Foxridge Fox Terriers www.trainthedog.com


   Feb. 21, 2006  HBO's Premier Show America Undercover revealed the horror of "dog bunchers" and dealers who buy dogs from illegal sources and sell them to research labs - if they survive.  What does this have to do with BBR?  Because the one of the most notorious Class B dealers--Martin Creek Kennels in Arkansas is shown buying and keeping dogs in excruciating violation of the USDA Animal Welfare Amendment regulations after he was under Federal investigation.  So much for PAWS - an amendment to the AWA regulation - proven to be consistently and flagrantly un-enforced!  Dogs were recorded in the most inhumane conditions, starving, freezing, dying.  Just one heart-wrenching example of why PAWS will not change anything except political futures (and income for AKC?) and why the BREEDER BILL OF RIGHTS adamantly opposes PAWS and all meaningless regulations that do nothing to protect the dogs.