Who's looking out for YOU? Project: 2006
Breeder Bill Of Rights defines and defends the
Private Breeder.
TheDogPlace knows what threatens the breed purist in today's
power-driven society.
TheDogPlace
loves dogs and those who prove they do, every day, in every way.
TheDogPlace
upholds the original AKC Mission Statement and
our
Mission is clear.
This
Organization has supported the sport since 1999 and will continue
to:
Preserve and Protect
the traditional,
inherent Rights
of all who love dogs.
Thank You to
TheDogPress.com
for encouraging its subscribers to support Breeder Bill
Of Rights
If you are a dedicated
Private Breeder with a plan for the future, you will be interested in the following.....
Handy
Links
AKC/Eukanuba 2006 Venue Conflict
Long Beach Lifts Breeding Ban but at what
cost?
Home Invasion!! Virginia Style
Land where freedom was born strips citizen Rights
Mandatory
2006 Spay/Neuter Bill
VA. proposes law with NO EXCEPTIONS
Animal
Rights vs The Showing Fancier
A growing conflict examined by Private Breeder/Judge
SPCA Steals Dogs
ABC's 20/20 undercover reveals Houston SPCA at work!
and more on the way!
Send Your Comments for line items or points for the first BBR
draft OR synopsis of Breeder Privacy or Rights infringement.
|
|
ANIMAL RIGHTS AND THE SHOWING FANCIER
by Tam Cordingley
|
The Animal
Rights/ Animal Control/ Humane Society people have lined up against the
dog people to create what they view as a solution to the dog/cat
overpopulation problem. In fact the group I represent don't wish to be
lumped in with the backyard breeders and commercial market breeders. We
are a group of dedicated, responsible hobbyists, much akin to the
hunting dog people. We wish to be a part of the solution, not a part of
the problem.
The solution to the Animal Control and
overpopulation problem lies not in legislating responsible hobbyists out
of their hobby, but in making a distinction between the careless
indiscriminate puppy producer, and the responsible Show or Field
exhibitor. Most legislation
specifically excludes the hunting dog people. This exclusion is because
the dogs are used recreationally, kept fenced when not under the owner's
direct control, vaccinated, and too valuable to end up a ward of Animal
Control. All of these same conditions apply to the showing fancier who
typically spends money and time on and with their dogs. They contribute
significantly to the revenue of their respective states.
Look at a
typical dog show exhibitor. They either have a motor home or stay
numerous weekends a year in local motels, they eat at restaurants, buy
gasoline, enter events and buy products at dog shows in their state.
Most are property owners, all vaccinate their pets, most keep older
retired dogs until they die, they breed seldom and place puppies
carefully. They all keep their dogs fenced for security. These are not
the people creating the animal control nightmare, they are the law
abiding citizens who will be harmed by restrictive and all inclusive
legislation.
I see this not
as dog people against Animal Control but rather as a triangular issue.
One side being Animal rights and Animal Control, a second being the
hunting or exhibiting breed fancier, and the third being the backyard
breeder and the mass producers. In many communities the Animal Control
people and the fanciers are strongly aligned and are of significant help
to each other. For example, every breed has a rescue committee that
will take dogs of their breeds from shelters, spay or neuter, and place
them in homes. In well over 40 years as a dog show and obedience
trial exhibitor I have never met a fellow dog show exhibitor that didn't
fence their dogs, or otherwise confine them. I have also never met one
who didn't vaccinate for rabies.
As dog people it
is our responsibility to educate the legislators about Issues WE know.
The AR people work mightily to push thru legislation in many states and
it sounds fine if you don't truly understand the situation. To this
end, and hopefully to improve the situation of the showing fancier, I
would ask you to cut and paste the 3 paragraphs above to any and all
discussion groups to which you belong and to as many dog people as you
know.
Showing Fanciers
of America is a group dedicated to helping in a positive way to educate
the legislators without being viewed as breeders. The simple word
Breeder, to us as hobbyists a proud title, is viewed by AR and AC people
as the bad guy. The only way to differentiate ourselves and be seen as
different from the backyard breeder or puppy miller is to label
ourselves differently.
Tam Cordingley, Foxridge Fox Terriers
www.trainthedog.com
Feb.
21, 2006 HBO's Premier Show America Undercover
revealed the horror of "dog bunchers" and dealers who buy
dogs from illegal sources and sell them to research labs - if they
survive. What does this have to do with BBR? Because the
one
of the most notorious Class B dealers--Martin Creek Kennels in
Arkansas is shown buying and keeping dogs in excruciating
violation of the USDA Animal Welfare Amendment regulations after
he was under Federal investigation. So much for PAWS - an
amendment to the AWA regulation - proven to be consistently and
flagrantly un-enforced! Dogs were recorded in the most inhumane
conditions, starving, freezing, dying. Just one
heart-wrenching example of why PAWS will not change anything except
political futures (and income for AKC?) and why the BREEDER BILL OF
RIGHTS adamantly opposes PAWS and all meaningless regulations that
do nothing to protect the dogs.
|