|
NUTRITION, LIES, AND QUALITY CONTROL
Poisoning Your Pet or
Why Read Pet Food Labels?
by Barbara J. Andrews
Update May 2007 –
This 1996 ShowSight Magazine column was uncannily predictive of the
frequency and increasing magnitude of Pet Food Recalls. Melamine is
just one example of Quality Control failure. Here’s how it happens,
why labels are misleading, and how to reduce the odds of poisoning
your pet.
If there's one thing dog
people love to talk about and worry about, it is nutrition. There
are thousands of articles full of authoritative information. There's
this little problem though. Most pets are nutritionally SICK.
First, some elementary stuff.
Pet food research facilities have established what constitutes good
canine nutrition. Problem is, the lab technician's idea of "good
nutrition" may not jibe with your dog's instincts and what nature
intended. Your dog will eat whatever you give him because he is
hungry. That does not mean it is what he wants or what’s best for
him; it is his only alternative to starvation.
It is up to you to figure out
what your dog needs. Most of you have. While we might be able to
make a better mixture than commercial rations, hardly anyone has the
time so let's assume that we all use some amount of kibble.
Second, a basic premise about
commercially prepared foods. You are unlikely to get total nutrition from a
bag or can. Would you raise a child on nothing but dry cereal? A healthy diet must include "live" raw foods such as
fruits and veggies, and yes, meat. We are omnivores. In theory, we
could live on vegetables and grains but dogs and cats
are carnivores. They need fresh meat, fish, and
poultry. It must be wholesome, which equates to uncontaminated with drugs, growth
hormones, chemicals or DDD meat, i.e. dead, diseased, or dying.
Companion animals generally DO
NOT receive wholesome food, no matter what the label says. Zoo
animals are given fresh meat and/or veggies and fruit along with
their commercial rations. No tiger ever turned down fresh meat. They
"wolf" it down. What about your dog or cat? Does it seem disinterested in
the food bowl?
Any good vet would
agree that domesticated meat eaters are experiencing ever-increasing
problems associated with diet. How can that be? You read labels and
demand purity and quality.
Aha, now there's a problem -
labels. In order for the manufacturer to provide a premium product,
he must know the ingredients are as represented. Those ingredients
must reach your pet in a stable form which is still of benefit to
the animal. I have good friends in the pet food business. They
sincerely believe their product is all it's cracked up to be. I hope
they are reading this because like me, they may have been living in
a make-believe world.
The problem is quality
control. I used to think that the good folks in the lab coats KNEW
what was in the product. Then one day I had reason to be curious
about a couple of ingredients. That's when I discovered things
aren’t always what they seem to be.
The U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) is
considered the "standard" whereby nutrient products are tested. The
problem is that only 64 of the more than 2,000 pages in the book
actually deal with assays, the procedure which validates the content
of a particular substance. The USP book gives no assay methods for
testing common nutrients such as amino acids, herbs, or plant
extracts.
There's more. Multi-nutrient
products such as pet food or vitamin powders are practically
impossible to assay. If there’s a combination of physiologically
active substances, the USP book cautions that assays results will be
compromised.
There doesn't
seem to be any other source that details assay procedures for
nutrients. HPLC (High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography) machines are
most commonly used for assays. They must be re-calibrated by running
standard reference materials. Then exactly the right solutions and
solvent must be used and the raw data carefully calculated,
analyzed, and interpreted. That takes time. A lot of time. And
there's no margin for error or the results will be off. And it has
to be repeated for each different ingredient.....
In other words, it rarely
happens!!! Instead, the pet food company buyer trusts the seller is selling
what he says he's selling. The CEO trusts that the buyer got what he
bought and that the company chemist knows what's really in the
product. The chemist at the research lab doesn’t think about the
results being compromised by ingredients that aren't
in the product or those that are but shouldn't be.
What does this mean? Oh not
much, unless you're a label reader, concerned about what's in that
product. If you are trying to balance nutrients in order to offset a
largely artificial diet, you expect accuracy and viability of the
ingredients for which you paid so dearly. That may be hard to
ascertain because the pet food
manufacturer may not know what's in the product or worse yet, may not care!
My solution? Aw heck, I'm back
to chopping veggies and planting herbs and looking for another
healthy butcher beef. I'm even thinking about raising some chickens
and expanding the garden....
reprint permission
SHOWSIGHT MAGAZINE May 1996
Copyright © 1996 - 2008 Barbara J. Andrews.
All rights reserved except for brief reference quotations
citing author and source. Article Reprint rights granted
only a when working link to this page is provided or if print
media, TheDogPlace.org is listed as source. No portions may be
otherwise stored, used,
or reprinted in any form without prior express written consent of
Barbara J. Andrews.
|