|
Call Your Shot...
$500 Bet
Project
2001
by Barbara J. Andrews
- Part Two of Two
Call Your Shot $500 Bet
Part One Pun intended. My five one hundred dollars
bills are still on the table. While we wait
for someone to take my bet, let's continue
to explore major causes for immune-system
disease.
Lyme disease evolved from "unheard of"
to a priority subject and almost simultaneously,
there was a vaccine. It's almost as if the
drug company had developed the cure before
the disease became a problem. One has to
wonder where all the new vaccinatable diseases
come from? How widespread are they? Is the
significance of some viruses only as a line
on a financial plotting graph? Will the efficiency
of a new vaccine outweigh its possible side
effects? How does one get factual information
on the frequency and seriousness of side
effects? Unfortunately, there are not enough
scientists willing to candidly discuss these
issues, much less raise their own pertinent
questions. One does not bite the hand that
feeds....
One of the most famous (and credible) of
all is Dr. Jonas Salk whose biological research
resulted in the polio vaccine. The December
1988 issue of DVM magazine featured a Vaccine
Roundtable discussion in which the many benefits
of vaccines were weighed against the risks,
both known and suspected.
Young animals are at higher risk of contracting
vaccine-induced disease due to their undeveloped
immune systems. Dr. Swango (Auburn University
Assoc. Professor of Virology, specializing
in canine virus diseases) cites high risk
in "Any animal under 4 weeks of age..."
and went on to say that "even in 6 to
8 weeks old puppies the distemper vaccine
may occasionally induce disease." He
stipulated that vaccine disease is more likely
in compromised puppies and kittens. Dr. Swango
also makes a mind-stopping statement. "There
is a difference between vaccination and immunization."
i.e. vaccination doesn't guarantee immunity.
Dr. Tizard (Professor and Head of Microbiology
and Parasitology, TX A&M) acknowledges
"There is a problem of vaccine-associated
disease that cannot be avoided."
Dr. Salk reminds us "to be altogether
pragmatic when the disease is of far greater
risk than the methods that are employed in
their control." For example, the risk
of widespread rabies is far greater than
the possible result of vaccine-induced reactions
or disease. As science has advanced, we now
know that modified live vaccines shed, mutate
in the host, and are capable of inducing
disease, therefore killed rabies is now used.
Regarding the choice of killed over modified
live products, Dr. Salk emphatically states
"with the killed virus vaccine we can
eliminate the disease altogether, both vaccine-induced
and naturally-occurring."
In Part One, we touched on the effect of
vaccines on the immune system and the corresponding
increase in immune related diseases in the
last decade. We accept that vaccines are
meant to challenge the immune system. Our
bodies whip the weakened form of the virus
and therefore are primed and ready to kill
the more virulent bug should it ever try
to invade us. Works great. Except when we
OVER challenge the immune system. That's
when we become "allergic" and susceptible
to a lot of puny bugs that we should have
sloughed off.
If we keep pecking away at our defense system,
year after year, with this shot and that,
with a wide assortment of chemicals and toxins,
with "medicines" which are proven
to confuse and weaken the immune system;
sooner or later, that defense will crumble.
Now, about our pets. We humans only get "puppy
shots." I don't know one person that
gets yearly boosters for polio, whooping
cough, measles, etc, etc. Do you? Then why
do you suppose our dogs need yearly shots?
Experts say they don't! The body keeps tabs
on what virus it's already defeated and if
the immune system is strong, (with but few
exceptions such as tetanus) it is able to
ward off a subsequent attack from the same
virus. Furthermore, if we accept Dr. Salk's
words on herd immunization, a healthy dog
is constantly accumulating new immunities
from vaccinated dogs.
The knowledge I share with you could well
impact the profit level of a clinic that
refuses to move forward into preventative
health care rather than health care maintenance.
Knowing that, I realize some vets are beginning
to seethe and are already planning a scathing
rebuttal. That's good because in order to
debate, the good veterinarian will do his
or her own research and in so doing, may
well come to share the beliefs of a growing
number of medical doctors and animal care
professionals.
Here's the nightmare. We start our babies
out with wormings and big-time challenges
to their UNDEVELOPED system and we keep at
it and keep at it until they are at least
16 weeks old - or dead from the parvo or
corona they shouldn't have caught. If they
break with disease, we're always told it
was because of that window. The window exists
- but so does the reality of vaccine-induced
disease!
If they survive the first weeks of constant
bombardment, we then hit them with a rabies
shot. NOT to protect the dog. It is to protect
the human population and rightly so. Compared
to human lives, animals are expendable and
that's as it should be. It doesn't mean that
we should close our eyes to the possible
side-effects of rabies vaccination, failing
to recognize and respond to symptoms should
they occur in our own beloved dogs.
OK, so about six months after the potent
rabies vaccine, we assault them again with
boosters and probably get them up the nose
again while we're at it, and by now they're
wearing flea collars or are being dipped
and dusted, and of course, they're getting
that heartworm poison. Six months later,
another rabies shot; hopefully your state
will let the dog recover for two to four
years before blasting him with yet another
rabies booster. By the way, who decides that
dogs in some states must be "challenged"
every year with potent rabies vaccine whereas
dogs in other states are immune for up to
four years? The state Veterinary association?
The Legislature? Who????
It's along about this time that an estimated
fifty percent of "cared for" dogs
develop immune and/or thyroid problems. Many
are simply treated as "allergies"
and as such, the dog often receives medications
specifically designed to QUIET the immune
system!! Hard to believe isn't it? Strays
escape the onslaught of care most of us provide
our dogs..... and notably, their immune systems
are strong. Of course, those of us who notice
that interesting fact are just asking to
be blamed for "inbreeding" our
dogs and harming their immune systems. Our
fault again!
DVM June 1991 carried an interesting article
by Priscilla Stockner, DVM. She details case
histories of immune-mediated orthopedic disease
symptoms which occurred following modified-live
vaccine administration in Great Danes. The
vaccine reactions included inability to rise,
pain, joint stiffness, high temps, and dramatic
thyroid malfunctions.
Other case histories mention aggression as
a not uncommon reaction. Now if Dr. Blank
vaccinates Mrs. Smith's lap dog and then
hears that Poopsie is "sick" and
then that Poopsie is "nasty" he's
likely to think the problem is in Mrs. Smith's
mind. If the family dog attacks a child,
the horror of the incident overrides the
likelihood of exploring a connection to recent
booster shots. I'm not suggesting that we
write bad temperament off to "shots."
On the other hand, when we encounter sudden
and inexplicable behavioral changes, the
first person we should turn to is a well
informed veterinarian.
Trainers and behavioral counselors please
take note. Do your homework on this. Example,
a description of severe reactions to canine
distemper virus. JAVMA vol 196, No. 11, June
1, 1990 pg 1852 reports "Development
of nervous system lesions was reflected by
observation of signs of aggression, which
eventually progressed to incoordination,
prostration, convulsions, and death."
The signs may be less pronounced, (sub-clinical
from an owner's perspective) but still dangerous
if one is dealing with a large breed.
There have been similar documented cases
of postvaccinal rabies in dogs, cats, and
people. Symptoms usually begin with lameness,
limb paralysis, and may include nervousness,
phobias, and even radical aggression.
Dr.Jean Dodds, DVM (prominent researcher,
NY State Dept. Of Health, widely published)
reports in a paper on Reactions to Vaccines
And Drugs, Part I "Parallel bone marrow
failure, immunosuppression, and immune-mediated
hematologic disease have been recognized
since the late 1970's in dogs exposed to
canine parvo virus or recently vaccinated
with modified live parvo virus and other
vaccines." Dr. Dodds cites fever, stiffness,
sore joints and abdominal tenderness, and
eventual collapse among symptoms that may
appear 1-3 days or 10-21 days after vaccination.
Well, the references could go on and on.
Our ability to absorb such heavy doses of
uncomfortable information does not. If you
would like SHOWSIGHT to continue this subject,
drop me a note. Time does not permit me to
respond to you on an individual basis but
I am interested in medically documented experiences
of vaccine reactions or your quotable comments
regarding the increase in immune problems
over the last decade. Just as I did with
data on reproductive problems associated
with feline distemper/early canine parvo
vaccine (The Dog Newspaper), we will report
YOUR findings to the Fancy. Please indicate
whether your name can be used in giving credit
or quotes for future columns.
By the way, shall we talk about Clinton's
REQUIRED vaccination of children and the
possibility that newborns will be vaccinated
before leaving the hospital? Possibly that
injection will include a micro-chip? Are our dogs canaries of the twentieth
century in more ways than one? You tell me.....
Copyright © 1993 Barbara J. Andrews. All rights reserved. Except
for brief reference
quotations with source provided, no portions thereof may be
stored or reprinted in any
form, electronic or otherwise,
without prior express written consent of Barbara J. Andrews.
reprint permission
SHOWSIGHT MAGAZINE Sept. 1993
more on subject
click
here
back to previous page |